Thinking Outside The Big Box – So BEST
BEST was the best.  they were like the Best Buy of their time.  little did I know that at one point, they also had THE best buildings EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the architectural firm SITE created 9 unique buildings for BEST
Peeling Project, Richmond, Virginia, 1971
–
Intermediate Facade Building, Houston, Texas, 1974
–
Notch Showroom, Sacramento, California, 1977
–
Tilt Showroom, Towson, Maryland, 1978
–
Cutler Ridge Showroom, Miami, Florida, 1979
–
Anti-Sign, Ashland, Virginia, 1979
–
Hialeah Rainforest Showroom, Hialeah, Florida, 1979
–
Forest Showroom, Richmond, Virginia, 1980
–
Inside/Outside Building, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1984
–
unknown location, Washington DC area
–
sadly, none of those buildings look like that anymore, eggcept for the Forest Showroom one which is now a church!!!!!
–
but SITE wasn’t the only firm to make BEST buildings
Denise Scott Brown and Robert Venturi -Â Langhorne, Pennsylvania, 1978
–
sadly, these guys were never built!
Parking Lot Building by SITE, 1977
1977 — Anthony J. Lumsden
The Earth, the Temple, and the Goods (unbuilt), 1979 — Robert A.M. Stern
1979 — Charles W. Moore
1979 — Michael Graves
1979 — Allen Greenberg
–
check out this short documentary on the BEST stores designed by SITE. directed and produced by Howard Silver
h/t Wandrlust | Arqueologia del Futuro | Cultural Ghosts | Super Rad Now
Ladies Hey
dude, Cheryl Tiegs is still hotter than yer mom, and even most younger ladies
even hotter than Sharon Stone – in 2009
TIEGS!!
we’re still nuts for India [NSFW]
as she still tickles our ivories. Â whatever that means
+
we always ready to take time for Martine!!!
Ms McCutcheon still makes us want to mcTouchin ourselves
McTrademark Infringement
never 5get – those McSleep hotels that never were!!!!!!!!!!



Â
In 1988, Quality Inns (now Choice Hotels) was planning to open a new chain of economy hotels under the name ‘McSleep’. Â After McDonald’s demanded that Quality Inns not use the name because it infringed, the hotel company filed a suit in federal court seeking a declaratory judgment that ‘McSleep’ did not infringe. McDonald’s counterclaimed, alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. Eventually, McDonald’s prevailed. The court’s opinion noted that the prefix ‘Mc’ added to a generic word has acquired secondary meaning, so that in the eyes of the public it means McDonalds, and therefore the name ‘McSleep’ would infringe on McDonald’s trademarks [wiki]
not to be confused with McSleeping


20. Mar, 2014 




























































